The limits of counterfactual computation
Graeme Mitchison, Richard Jozsa
Abstract
We show that the protocol recently proposed by Hosten et al. does not allow all possible results of a computation to be obtained counterfactually, as was claimed. It only gives a counterfactual outcome for one of the computer outputs. However, we confirm the observation that the protocol gives some protection against decoherence. In some situations, though, it may be more effective simply to run the computer several times.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spectral Fingerprints of Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer
Graham Van Goffrier, Debasish Banerjee, Bipasha Chakraborty et al.
Dynamics of local quantum information in random unitary circuits
Ratul Thakur, Sthitadhi Roy
Factorized Boolean representations for efficient quantum synthesis
Mehul Shah, Robert Fiszer, Marek Perkowski
Detuning- and Stark-robust Rydberg gates
Elie Bataille, Gyohei Nomura, Manuel Endres
Krylov Break Times from an Inhomogeneous Lieb--Robinson Light Cone
Shunji Matsuura, Yoji Kawamura, Joseph Salfi et al.
Stochastic transport of a Goldstone mode in a self-organized atomic crystal
Zhanhai Yu, Di Xiang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.