Quantum Physics and Human Language
James B. Hartle
Abstract
Human languages employ constructions that tacitly assume specific properties of the limited range of phenomena they evolved to describe. These assumed properties are true features of that limited context, but may not be general or precise properties of all the physical situations allowed by fundamental physics. In brief, human languages contain `excess baggage' that must be qualified, discarded, or otherwise reformed to give a clear account in the context of fundamental physics of even the everyday phenomena that the languages evolved to describe. The surest route to clarity is to express the constructions of human languages in the language of fundamental physical theory, not the other way around. These ideas are illustrated by an analysis of the verb `to happen' and the word `reality' in special relativity and the modern quantum mechanics of closed systems.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spectral Fingerprints of Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer
Graham Van Goffrier, Debasish Banerjee, Bipasha Chakraborty et al.
Dynamics of local quantum information in random unitary circuits
Ratul Thakur, Sthitadhi Roy
Factorized Boolean representations for efficient quantum synthesis
Mehul Shah, Robert Fiszer, Marek Perkowski
Detuning- and Stark-robust Rydberg gates
Elie Bataille, Gyohei Nomura, Manuel Endres
Krylov Break Times from an Inhomogeneous Lieb--Robinson Light Cone
Shunji Matsuura, Yoji Kawamura, Joseph Salfi et al.
Stochastic transport of a Goldstone mode in a self-organized atomic crystal
Zhanhai Yu, Di Xiang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.