Ghost Imaging: What is quantum, what is not
Baris I. Erkmen, Jeffrey H. Shapiro
Abstract
We provide a unified treatment of classical and quantum Gaussian-state sources that unambiguously identifies which features of ghost imaging are strictly quantum mechanical. We show that ghost-image formation is fundamentally classical, with the image being expressible in terms of the phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive cross correlations between the detected fields. We then consider ghost-imaging scenarios with either phase-insensitive or phase-sensitive sources, where the former are always classical but the latter may be classical or quantum mechanical. We show that if their auto-correlations are identical, then a quantum source provides resolution improvement in its near-field and field-of-view improvement in its far field when compared to a classical source.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spectral Fingerprints of Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer
Graham Van Goffrier, Debasish Banerjee, Bipasha Chakraborty et al.
Dynamics of local quantum information in random unitary circuits
Ratul Thakur, Sthitadhi Roy
Factorized Boolean representations for efficient quantum synthesis
Mehul Shah, Robert Fiszer, Marek Perkowski
Detuning- and Stark-robust Rydberg gates
Elie Bataille, Gyohei Nomura, Manuel Endres
Krylov Break Times from an Inhomogeneous Lieb--Robinson Light Cone
Shunji Matsuura, Yoji Kawamura, Joseph Salfi et al.
Stochastic transport of a Goldstone mode in a self-organized atomic crystal
Zhanhai Yu, Di Xiang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.