The Ithaca Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
N. David Mermin
Abstract
I list several strong requirements for what I would consider a sensible interpretation of quantum mechanics and I discuss two simple theorems. One, as far as I know, is new; the other was only noted a few years ago. Both have important implications for such a sensible interpretation. My talk will not clear everything up; indeed, you may conclude that it has not cleared anything up. But I hope it will provide a different perspective from which to view some old and vexing puzzles (or, if you believe nothing needs to be cleared up, some ancient verities.)
Create a lesson
Related papers
Using topology to reveal all mutually unbiased bases in dimension six
Mateo Cárdenes Wuttig, Joseph Tindall
Arithmetic Depth, Minimal Gate Alphabets, and Exact Program-State Resources for Single-Qubit Dyadic Programs
Tony Newton, Dan-Adrian German
Probing gravity at megahertz frequencies with levitated rotors
Matteo Fadel, Andrea Vinante
Optimal Holding Times for Entanglement Swapping
Van Sy Mai, Richard J. La, Abdella Battou
Quantum Algorithms for Molecular Response Functions: Resolvent Kernels, Time-Domain Sampling, Query Lower Bounds with Matched Single-Point Calibers, and a Six-Route Comparison
Yunlong Liu, Yujin Tang, Miao Xu et al.
GFlowQEC: Generative Flow Networks that Learn to Sample Quantum LDPC Codes
Nuno Batista, Gabriel Falcao, Penousal Machado