Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing
Charles H. Bennett, Ethan Bernstein, Gilles Brassard, Umesh Vazirani
Abstract
Recently a great deal of attention has focused on quantum computation following a sequence of results suggesting that quantum computers are more powerful than classical probabilistic computers. Following Shor's result that factoring and the extraction of discrete logarithms are both solvable in quantum polynomial time, it is natural to ask whether all of NP can be efficiently solved in quantum polynomial time. In this paper, we address this question by proving that relative to an oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class NP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time o(2n/2). We also show that relative to a permutation oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class NP coNP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time o(2n/3). The former bound is tight since recent work of Grover shows how to accept the class NP relative to any oracle on a quantum computer in time O(2n/2).
Create a lesson
Related papers
Approximate Synthetic Spectra of Quantum Systems Associated with Compact Lie Groups
Junyang Liu, Hang Wang, Houjin Wang et al.
An example of universal braiding in Links--Gould topological quantum computation
Matthew Harper, Ben-Michael Kohli
Reasoning about Shared-Qubit Concurrency in Quantum Computing
Mingsheng Ying
Information-Geometric Representation of Upper Bounds on Fluctuation Growth in Open Quantum Systems
Newshaw Bahreyni, Paul M. Alsing
Initialization-controlled fault sensitivity and force-balance plateaus in noisy variational quantum optimization
Longhui Shen, Fangzhou Jin, Bin Guo
Quantum identity authentication protocol via perturbed probability amplitudes
Xiangqun Fu, Zheng Han, Hongwei Li et al.