Comment on "Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements"
G. M. D'Ariano, C. Macchiavello
Abstract
In the two papers [T. Kiss, U. Herzog, and U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2433 (1995); U. Herzog, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1245 (1996)] with titles similar to the one given above, the authors assert that in some cases it is possible to compensate a quantum efficiency η≤ 1/2 in quantum-state measurements, violating the lower bound 1/2 proved in a preceding paper [G. M. D'Ariano, U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Phys. Rev. A 52, R1801 (1995)]. Here we re-establish the bound as unsurpassable for homodyning any quantum state, and show how the proposed loss-compensation method would always fail in a real measurement outside the allowed η>1/2 region.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Comment on "Supervised Learning with Quantum Hamiltonian Embeddings" (arXiv:2610.26833)
Alexander G. Abanov, Luca Candelori, Kharen Musaelian
Data informed Ansatz Selection for Variational Quantum Circuits
Manav Seksaria, Advith Desu, Anil Prabhakar
Operational Thresholds for Long-Range Entanglement in Quantum Networks
Arn Caesar, Xinqi Hu, Kim Christensen
QECert: Formal Foundations for Quantum Error-Correction Theory in Lean
Keming He, Jiahan Chen, Enji Xiong et al.
Reopening the one clean qubit case of a semi-grand challenge
Christopher W. Mansell
Recoverability of Gravitational Entanglement under Decoherence
Yi-Xuan Wang, Julen S. Pedernales, Martin B. Plenio