Comment on "Loss-error compensation in quantum-state measurements"
G. M. D'Ariano, C. Macchiavello
Abstract
In the two papers [T. Kiss, U. Herzog, and U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2433 (1995); U. Herzog, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1245 (1996)] with titles similar to the one given above, the authors assert that in some cases it is possible to compensate a quantum efficiency η≤ 1/2 in quantum-state measurements, violating the lower bound 1/2 proved in a preceding paper [G. M. D'Ariano, U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Phys. Rev. A 52, R1801 (1995)]. Here we re-establish the bound as unsurpassable for homodyning any quantum state, and show how the proposed loss-compensation method would always fail in a real measurement outside the allowed η>1/2 region.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Parallel quantum channel discrimination and numerical ranges in tensor product subspaces
Adam Bílek, Paulina Lewandowska, Ryszard Kukulski
Asymptotically Good Quantum Locally Testable Codes
William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo
All causally separable quantum processes are quantum circuits with classical control of causal order
Julian Wechs, Alastair A. Abbott, Cyril Branciard
Analytic leakage suppression with a single control field: fast two-qubit gates with tunable couplers
Lukas Heunisch, Michael J. Hartmann, Aashish A. Clerk
Procrastinating einselection in non-Markovian quantum dynamics
Michael J. Moody, Tara Kalsi, Agung Budiyono et al.
Quantum Entropy Contraction and Factorization from Hypercontractivity
Li Gao, Lijun Wang