Timing and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments
Caroline H. Thompson
Abstract
Re-evaluation of the evidence (some of it unpublished) shows that experimenters conducting Einstein-Podolsky-Bohm (EPR) experiments may have been deceived by various pre-conceptions and artifacts. False or unproven assumptions were made regarding, in some cases, fair sampling, in others timing, accidental coincidences and enhancement. Realist possibilities, assuming a purely wave model of light, are presented heuristically, and suggestions given for fruitful lines of research. Quantum Mechanics can be proved false, but Bell tests have turned out to be unsuitable for the task.
Create a lesson
Related papers
An entangling Hubbard quasiparticle collider on a digital quantum processor
Chan Bin Bark, Hanbyul Kim, Yoonil Koo et al.
A Warped Born Rule Turns an Observer into a Maxwell's Demon
Olumakinde Ogunnaike
A scalable sample-based quantum diagonalization solver for general Pauli-sum Hamiltonians
Yutaro Iiyama
Quantum Query Complexity of Maximum Degree and its Generalizations
Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro et al.
Maximally antiflat fixed-particle-number fermionic states
Rahul Gupta, Arya Haghighian, James D. Whitfield
An Annealing-based Quantum Neural Network with Discrete Wavelet Transforms for Enhanced Air Pollution Nowcasting
Otto Menegasso Pires, André Saimon, Daniela Herrmann et al.