Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon?
Raymond Y. Chiao, John C. Garrison
Abstract
We reconsider the consequences of the observed violations of Bell's inequalities. Two common responses to these violations are: (i) the rejection of realism and the retention of locality, and (ii) the rejection of locality and the retention of realism. Here we critique response (i). We argue that locality contains an implicit form of realism, since in a world view that embraces locality, spacetime, with its usual, fixed topology, has properties independent of measurement. Hence we argue that response (i) is incomplete, in that its rejection of realism is only partial.
Create a lesson
Related papers
An entangling Hubbard quasiparticle collider on a digital quantum processor
Chan Bin Bark, Hanbyul Kim, Yoonil Koo et al.
A Warped Born Rule Turns an Observer into a Maxwell's Demon
Olumakinde Ogunnaike
A scalable sample-based quantum diagonalization solver for general Pauli-sum Hamiltonians
Yutaro Iiyama
Quantum Query Complexity of Maximum Degree and its Generalizations
Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro et al.
Maximally antiflat fixed-particle-number fermionic states
Rahul Gupta, Arya Haghighian, James D. Whitfield
An Annealing-based Quantum Neural Network with Discrete Wavelet Transforms for Enhanced Air Pollution Nowcasting
Otto Menegasso Pires, André Saimon, Daniela Herrmann et al.