TSQT `Elements of Possibility'?
R. E. Kastner
Abstract
I defend my arguments in quant-ph/9806002, which have recently been criticized by L. Vaidman (quant-ph/9811092). I emphasize that the correct usage of the ABL rule applies not to a genuine counterfactual statement but rather to a conjunction of material conditionals. I argue that the only kind of valid counterfactual statement one can make using the ABL rule is a ``might'' counterfactual, which is not adequate for the attribution of `elements of reality' to a quantum system.
Create a lesson
Related papers
An entangling Hubbard quasiparticle collider on a digital quantum processor
Chan Bin Bark, Hanbyul Kim, Yoonil Koo et al.
A Warped Born Rule Turns an Observer into a Maxwell's Demon
Olumakinde Ogunnaike
A scalable sample-based quantum diagonalization solver for general Pauli-sum Hamiltonians
Yutaro Iiyama
Quantum Query Complexity of Maximum Degree and its Generalizations
Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro et al.
Maximally antiflat fixed-particle-number fermionic states
Rahul Gupta, Arya Haghighian, James D. Whitfield
An Annealing-based Quantum Neural Network with Discrete Wavelet Transforms for Enhanced Air Pollution Nowcasting
Otto Menegasso Pires, André Saimon, Daniela Herrmann et al.