TSQT `Elements of Possibility'?
R. E. Kastner
Abstract
I defend my arguments in quant-ph/9806002, which have recently been criticized by L. Vaidman (quant-ph/9811092). I emphasize that the correct usage of the ABL rule applies not to a genuine counterfactual statement but rather to a conjunction of material conditionals. I argue that the only kind of valid counterfactual statement one can make using the ABL rule is a ``might'' counterfactual, which is not adequate for the attribution of `elements of reality' to a quantum system.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spectral Fingerprints of Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer
Graham Van Goffrier, Debasish Banerjee, Bipasha Chakraborty et al.
Dynamics of local quantum information in random unitary circuits
Ratul Thakur, Sthitadhi Roy
Factorized Boolean representations for efficient quantum synthesis
Mehul Shah, Robert Fiszer, Marek Perkowski
Detuning- and Stark-robust Rydberg gates
Elie Bataille, Gyohei Nomura, Manuel Endres
Krylov Break Times from an Inhomogeneous Lieb--Robinson Light Cone
Shunji Matsuura, Yoji Kawamura, Joseph Salfi et al.
Stochastic transport of a Goldstone mode in a self-organized atomic crystal
Zhanhai Yu, Di Xiang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.