Are Repeaters Prevalent Among the Known Fast Radio Burst Sources?

Abstract

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond radio pulses of unknown origin. Despite extensive follow-up observations, only $\sim3\%$ of FRBs have been confirmed as repeaters. It remains unclear whether the rest are truly one-off bursts, or essentially repeating sources that have only been detected once due to limited monitoring time. Using the second CHIME/FRB catalog, we test this debate by comparing non-repeaters with two repeater-based subsamples: the first-detected bursts of repeaters and their highest-fluence bursts. A non-parametric method that accounts for selection effects is employed to derive the energy functions and event rates of these samples. All samples are well described by broken power-law energy distributions with comparable break energies ($\sim 5\times10^{38}$ erg), but with significantly different slopes between repeating and non-repeating populations. Their event-rate evolution also differs significantly. Assuming $ρ(z) \propto (1+z)^B$, we have $B = -5.57^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$ for non-repeaters and $B = -8.63^{+0.46}_{-0.41}$ and $-9.10^{+0.55}_{-0.56}$ for the two repeater samples. Size-matched resampling shows that the repeater event-rate indices lie far outside the 5$σ$ range expected from non-repeater subsamples, ruling out sample size as the reason for the observed difference. These results indicate that at least a subset of one-off FRBs are intrinsically non-repeating, implying that repeating sources may represent a distinct and possibly less common population.