When quantum field theory kicks in: the relation between matter, gravity and energy
Antonio Ferreiro, Andrea Cavallaro
Abstract
The existence of energy is the main criterion for (i) providing a common core to the materiality of all types of classical matter and (ii) denying that the gravitational field of General Relativity is a type of matter. Extending this criterion to quantum field theory, though formally straightforward, carries new conceptual consequences for the interpretation of gravity. Renormalization of the quantum matter stress-energy tensor forces a local, purely geometric term, built from the metric alone, into the conserved stress-energy, and this has two faces. It grants the metric a material significance alongside its spatio-temporal one (the egalitarian view); and it binds gravitational to non-gravitational energy so tightly that the two cannot be split apart without a choice of vacuum that a generic spacetime does not supply (the unificationist view). The latter poses a dilemma: either gravitational energy is meaningless, but then so is the energy of the non-gravitational quantum fields, and only classical fields remain matter; or both are meaningful, and the metric thereby acquires the material significance of a matter field. On neither horn does the classical divide between matter and spacetime survive quantization.
Create a lesson
Related papers
On the Utility of Textbooks in Understanding the Renaissance of General Relativity
Bernadette Lessel
The contribution of Soviet scientists to the emergence of high-energy neutrino astrophysics: from the Cherenkov effect to underwater and in-ice telescopes
Bakhromzod Rizoi
Astronomia Ova: Kepler's Laws, Ptolemy's Equant, and Legendre's Polynomials
Cristopher Moore, Malcolm Smith, Stephan Mertens
On Gauge Gravity's 'Hypermomentum Challenge' to the Geometric Trinity
Kartik Tiwari
What is Physics For? Why Classical Physics is not the Limit of Quantum Mechanics
Adam Frank, Jacques L. Pienaar, Michel Bitbol et al.
From Mass to Energy-Momentum: The Field-Theoretic Perspective on the Energy-Mass Relation
Patrick M. Duerr, J. Brian Pitts