On the Utility of Textbooks in Understanding the Renaissance of General Relativity
Bernadette Lessel
Abstract
This paper argues for the historical utility of general relativity textbooks written during, or shortly before, the Renaissance of general relativity. More so than research papers, textbooks offer a narrative account of the field--one that may differ substantially from the accounts of other authors addressing the same subject. Textbooks on general relativity therefore constitute a distinctive form of testimony to the intellectual forces that shaped general relativity, particularly during its reinvention period from 1955 to the mid-1970s. A second pillar of this argument is the observation that nearly all principal investigators at the research centers previously identified by Lalli et al.--centers that functioned as intellectual epicenters of the Renaissance of general relativity--eventually produced a textbook associated with their own school of thought. To situate this observation within the broader development of the field, the paper presents a concise history of general relativity textbooks from the theory's inception in 1915-16 to the 1980s. This history illustrates one way in which textbooks can serve as sources for reconstructing the intellectual dynamics of the Renaissance of general relativity.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The contribution of Soviet scientists to the emergence of high-energy neutrino astrophysics: from the Cherenkov effect to underwater and in-ice telescopes
Bakhromzod Rizoi
When quantum field theory kicks in: the relation between matter, gravity and energy
Antonio Ferreiro, Andrea Cavallaro
Astronomia Ova: Kepler's Laws, Ptolemy's Equant, and Legendre's Polynomials
Cristopher Moore, Malcolm Smith, Stephan Mertens
On Gauge Gravity's 'Hypermomentum Challenge' to the Geometric Trinity
Kartik Tiwari
What is Physics For? Why Classical Physics is not the Limit of Quantum Mechanics
Adam Frank, Jacques L. Pienaar, Michel Bitbol et al.
From Mass to Energy-Momentum: The Field-Theoretic Perspective on the Energy-Mass Relation
Patrick M. Duerr, J. Brian Pitts