Enabling risk and reliability analysis in next-generation computational tools via multifidelity methods
Anirban Chaudhuri, Karen Willcox
Abstract
Risk and reliability analysis are fundamental to the design, assessment, and operation of safety-critical complex systems; however, their integration into next-generation computational tools is constrained by the cost of uncertainty quantification with expensive computational models. The computational challenge is particularly prohibitive for tail-sensitive quantities, such as probabilities of failure, conditional values-at-risk, and buffered probabilities of failure, where accurate estimation can require a large number of model evaluations. Multifidelity methods provide a framework for addressing this computational bottleneck by combining information from models of varying accuracy and cost while retaining the predictive accuracy of the high-fidelity model. This review summarizes the state of the art in methods that enable scalable risk and reliability analysis using multifidelity control variates, multifidelity importance sampling, and multifidelity active learning.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Process-zone condensation: a discretization-exact reduced cell model for FE2 analysis of composites with fibre-matrix debonding and matrix plasticity
Leonilson Toffoli Pedrini, Maycoln Conci, Rafael Marin Ferro
Methodological Assessment of Instrumented Indentation for Spatially Resolved Mesoscale Stiffness and Creep in Short Fiber-Reinforced Injection-Molded PBT Components
Eduard Klatt, Natalie Rauter
Stabilizing Neural Emulation of Spatiotemporal Physical Dynamics through Denoising Koopman Latent Dynamics
Chenxu Wu, Sixing Chen, Junming Hou et al.
Optimized size, shape and orientation of rhombic transposition flaps and excisions by gradient-based methods
Niels Aage, Brandon Marshal Parks
Theory-guided relational learning for data product pricing: An interpretable meta-path-guided graph neural network approach
Ruize Gao, Feng Xiao, Jinpu Li et al.
LLM-Generated Investment Research Memos Need Validation
Xukang Gong, Chenri Luo, Binyan Yu et al.