Comparison of flux creep an nonlinear E-j approach for analysis of vortex motion in superconductors
D. V. Shantsev, A. V. Bobyl, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen
Abstract
Two commonly accepted approaches for simulations of thermally-activated vortex motion in superconductors are compared. These are (i) the so-called flux creep approach based on the expression E=vB relating the electric field E to the velocity v of the thermally-activated flux motion and the local flux density B, and (ii) the approach employing a phenomenological nonlinear current-voltage curve, E(j). Our results show that the two approaches give similar but also distinctly different behaviors for the distributions of current and flux density in both a long slab and thin strip geometry. The differences are most pronounced where the local B is small. Magneto-optical imaging of a YBaCuO thin film carrying a transport current was performed to compare the simulations with experimental behavior. It is shown that the flux creep approach describes the experiments far better than simulations based on the E(j) approach.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Altermagnetic Control of Charge-4e Superconductivity
Yan-Guang Yue, Jie Lou, Yan Chen
Electron- and hole-doped superconductivity in two-dimensional electride ZrX2 (X = Cl, Br, I)
Tian-Xin Liu, Xin-Yang Li, Zuo-Wei Yin et al.
Enhanced Coulomb pseudopotentials in high-pressure hydrides from first principles
Kieran Bozier, Chris J. Pickard
Pressure-induced double-dome superconductivity in doped kagome metal Cs(V0.86Ta0.14)3Sb5 without charge density wave
Haochen Sun, Jing Wang, Deng Hu et al.
Electric and Heat Transport in One-Dimensional SNS Junctions with Energy-Dependent Transmission
Kai Tsutsumi, Shun Uchino
From band reconstruction to Bogoliubov dispersion: How dz2-band enhances iron-based superconductivity
Jingming Yan, Shendong Su, Guihao Jia et al.