Comment on "Superconducting anisotropy and evidence for intrinsic pinning in single crystalline MgB2"
M. Angst, R. Puzniak, A. Wisniewski, J. Roos, H. Keller, J. Karpinski
Abstract
In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. B 66, 012501 (2002)], torque data measured on a MgB2 single crystal in fields from 10 to 60 kOe at 10 K were presented. The authors obtained the anisotropy gamma by fitting a theoretical expression to the data and concluded that the anisotropy is field independent gamma ≈ 4.3. They also reported the observation of "intrinsic pinning", which they take as experimental evidence for the occurence of superconductivity in the boron layers. In this comment, we discuss the range of validity of the theoretical expression used by the authors and show that the conclusion of a field independent anisotropy does not hold. Furthermore, we present torque data measured on two crystals of MgB2, establishing the extrinsic nature of the peak in the irreversible torque observed in some crystals.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Altermagnetic Control of Charge-4e Superconductivity
Yan-Guang Yue, Jie Lou, Yan Chen
Electron- and hole-doped superconductivity in two-dimensional electride ZrX2 (X = Cl, Br, I)
Tian-Xin Liu, Xin-Yang Li, Zuo-Wei Yin et al.
Enhanced Coulomb pseudopotentials in high-pressure hydrides from first principles
Kieran Bozier, Chris J. Pickard
Pressure-induced double-dome superconductivity in doped kagome metal Cs(V0.86Ta0.14)3Sb5 without charge density wave
Haochen Sun, Jing Wang, Deng Hu et al.
Electric and Heat Transport in One-Dimensional SNS Junctions with Energy-Dependent Transmission
Kai Tsutsumi, Shun Uchino
From band reconstruction to Bogoliubov dispersion: How dz2-band enhances iron-based superconductivity
Jingming Yan, Shendong Su, Guihao Jia et al.