Comment on "Theory of tailoring sonic devices: Diffraction dominates over refraction"
A. Hakansson, J. Sanchez-Dehesa, F. Cervera, F. Meseguer, L. Sanchis, J. Llinares
Abstract
Recently N. Garcia et al. (Phys. Rev. E 67, 046606 (2003)) theoretically studied several acoustic devices with dimensions on de order of several wavelenghts. The authors discussed on experimental results previously reported by several of us (F. Cervera et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 023902 (2002)). They concluded that diffraction and not refraction is the ominating mechanism that explain the focusing effects observed in those experiments. In this Comment we reexamined their calculations and discussed why some of their interpretations of our results are misleading.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Longitudinal and Transverse Thermoelectric Properties in Topological Quantum Materials
Jyoti Duhan, Anil Kumar B. M., Satya N. Guin et al.
Thermally Conditioned Time-Series Forecasting of Grain Growth in Polycrystalline Materials
Eliane Younes, Elie Hachem, Marc Bernacki
Evolutionary Design of Interpretable Spatial Descriptors for Structure-Property Relationship Discovery
Aditya Raghavan, Sergei V Kalinin
Millikelvin magnetometry up to 30~T using a multi-cross micro-Hall sensor
Bingbing Tong, Yinina Ma, Zhenhua Zhao et al.
First-principles study of the formation of Group-IV--vacancy color centers in diamond
Xiangru Han, Adam Gali
Anomalous thermal transport in isotope-enriched germanium carbide
Wenjiang Zhou, Bai Song