Identifying the Bose glass phase
R. Pugatch, N. Bar-gill, N. Katz, E. Rowen, N. Davidson
Abstract
Introducing disorder into the Bose-Hubbard model at integer fillings leads to a Bose glass phase, along with the Mott insulator and superfluid phases. We suggest a new order parameter: the determinant of the one body density matrix, which is nonzero only within the Mott-insulator phase. Alongside the superfluid fraction, it is then possible to distinguish the three phases. The Bose glass phase is the only phase which has vanishing determinant and superfluid fraction. The vanishing of the determinant in the Bose glass phase occurs due to the partial fragmentation of the condensate into localized fragments, each with zero superfluid response, which implies the presence of unoccupied sites and hence the presence of lines of zeros in the one body density matrix. In the superfluid phase, the determinant vanish for another reason - due to the macroscopic occupation of a single particle state. Finally, we suggest the enhancement of the three body decay rate in the Bose glass phase, as an experimental indicator for the presence of localized fragments.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Nonparametric multiscale modeling of boundary lubrication: hexadecane in highly pressurized gold asperity contacts
Hannes Holey, Michael Moseler, Peter Gumbsch et al.
Asymmetric Ions in Solution are Similar to Active Brownian Particles
Setare Mostajabi Sarhangi, Dmitry V. Matyushov
Influence of twist direction and large deformation on soft material torsional contact
Yucai Hu, Pengfei Li, Michele Ciavarella et al.
Phase transitions and microphases in elastomers. II. Anisotropy-driven morphologies
Manu Mannattil, David Andelman, Haim Diamant
Comparing non-local granular fluid continuum models for silo discharge: Toward clogging prediction
Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, M. Li et al.
Residual semi-crystalline particles released during enzymatic degradation of plastics
Michael Schindler, Ludwik Leibler