Reply to cond-mat/0601101
V. N. Zavaritsky
Abstract
The author of the comment promotes a brush-like IVC, which is claimed to be free of self-heating. I will show that this claim lacks substantiation as the IVC is definitely not free from heating and that the self-heating cause of IVC-2 is indirectly admitted by the author of the comment. I will further show that the data selected for this comment in fact provide additional experimental evidence in favour of the major conclusions by the commented article in particular of the extrinsic cause of the key findings by intrinsic tunnelling spectroscopy.
Create a lesson
Related papers
High-Temperature Superconductivity of the Fe-Se-H compound
S. I. Bondarenko, A. A. Prokhorov, N. N. Galtsov et al.
Stabilization of Interband Phase Solitons in Two-Band Noncentrosymmetric Superconducting Rings
Yuriy Yerin, Boris Malomed, Stefan-Ludwig Drechsler et al.
Strain-driven orbital-selective reconstruction and bicollinear-to-stripe evolution in FeTe
Zhenfeng Ouyang, Yin Chen, Yi-Heng Tian et al.
Supercurrent detection and manipulation of topological phase transitions in Shiba-Majorana hybrid systems
Debika Debnath, Ioannis Ioannidis, Paramita Dutta et al.
Exact pair density wave in topological moire flat bands and universal superfluid stiffness
Zhengzhi Wu, Ming-rui Li, Hong Yao
Electrical manipulation of oxygen stoichiometry in multiterminal YBa2Cu3O7-δ junctions
Daniel Stoffels, Caio C. Quaglio-Gomes, Nicolas Lejeune et al.