Anderson transition: numerical vs analytical results (comment on the review article by P.Markos cond-mat/0609580)
I. M. Suslov
Abstract
In the recent review article, P.Markos admits that practically all numerical results on the critical behavior near the Anderson transition are in conflict with analytical expectations, but no serious discussion of this fact is given. The aim of the present comment is to give an analysis of the arising situation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Low-temperature magnetism and spin dynamics in the disordered triangular-lattice Yb3+ compound LiCaYb5(BO3)6
Monika Jawale, Saikat Nandi, Prashanta K. Mukharjee et al.
Neural Renormalization Group Flow for Percolation
Anaclara Alvez, Luca Camagna, Sergio Chibbaro et al.
Dynamical phase selection controls compute scaling in looped transformers
Gunn Kim
Semi-localized ground state in a 1D system with long-range hopping
Murod S. Bahovadinov, Faridun N. Jalolov, Vladimir E. Kravtsov et al.
Defect states in three-dimensional diamond photonic band gap crystals
Julia Rocha, Bart A. van Tiggelen, Ad Lagendijk et al.
Disorder-induced conducting edges on Kagomé lattice
A. Chmeruk, D. Jones, L. Chioncel