Comment on "Characterization of the tunneling conductance across DNA bases"
Johan Lagerqvist, Michael Zwolak, Massimiliano Di Ventra
Abstract
In a recent article, Zikic et al. [Phys. Rev. E 74, 011919 (2006)] present first-principles calculations of the DNA nucleotides electrical conductance. They report qualitative and quantitative differences with previous work, in particular with that of Zwolak and Di Ventra [Nano Lett. 5, 421 (2005)] and Lagerqvist et al. [Nano Lett. 6, 779 (2006)]. In this comment we address the alleged discrepancies and show that Zikic et al. have seriously misread and misunderstood the existing literature. In addition, we point out the deficiencies of their approach in calculating the conductance of nucleotides and the consequent erroneous conclusions they report.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Nonparametric multiscale modeling of boundary lubrication: hexadecane in highly pressurized gold asperity contacts
Hannes Holey, Michael Moseler, Peter Gumbsch et al.
Asymmetric Ions in Solution are Similar to Active Brownian Particles
Setare Mostajabi Sarhangi, Dmitry V. Matyushov
Influence of twist direction and large deformation on soft material torsional contact
Yucai Hu, Pengfei Li, Michele Ciavarella et al.
Phase transitions and microphases in elastomers. II. Anisotropy-driven morphologies
Manu Mannattil, David Andelman, Haim Diamant
Comparing non-local granular fluid continuum models for silo discharge: Toward clogging prediction
Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, M. Li et al.
Residual semi-crystalline particles released during enzymatic degradation of plastics
Michael Schindler, Ludwik Leibler