Reply to "Comment on `General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions'"
E. Marinari, C. Naitza, G. Parisi, M. Picco, F. Ritort, F. Zuliani
Abstract
In a comment cond-mat/9811080 to our paper (PRL, vol 81, 1698 (1998)) H. Bokil, A. Bray, B. Drossel and M. Moore claimed that we have reached wrong conclusions. We show here why their claims are not correct, especially when compared to the analysis of reference cond-mat/9808140.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The Stone-Wales trefoil: a new topological defect in graphene
M. V. Kondrin, Y. B. Lebed, V. V. Brazhkin
Short-Range Vector Spin Glasses: Parisi Hierarchies and Real-Space Ultrametricity
Akash Vijay, Jaewon Kim, Jong Yeon Lee
Lyapunov spectrum of random neural networks
David G. Clark
Revealing more on complex energy landscapes by passing less local information: Cavity approach with trust region in non-convex optimization problems
Zhiqi Xu, Chi Ho Yeung
Predicting activation-barrier and plasticity-onset statistics in a model of glasses
Makoto Suda, Edan Lerner, Eran Bouchbinder
Classifications in modular restricted Boltzmann machines
Elena Agliari, Andrea Lepre, Edoardo Roscani