Standardization versus Coverage in Wireless Telephone Networks
Neil Gandal, David Salant, Leonard Waverman
Abstract
The issue of market-based versus mandated standards has been addressed in many settings. In most settings in which network effects are present, compatibility across platforms has been a key determinant of the success or failure of a particular technology. In the case of wireless telecommunications, however, interconnection and the availability of the relevant infrastructure can be a substitute for compatibility. In this paper, we examine the tradeoff between mandated standards and interconnection. We first provide institutional background; we then empirically examine whether, other things being equal, penetration rates were lower (or higher) for countries with multiple incompatible digital standards. We finally discuss the implications of our results for the current debate about 3G standards, in which CDMA2000, which is backed mainly by US firms, competes with WCDMA, which is backed by the European Community.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Adversarial Attacks Reveal Divergent Deception Competence in Humans and Generative Language Models
Lucca Pfründer, Riccardo Loconte, Bruno Verschuere et al.
Who Can Say No? Control, Accountability and the Pace of Frontier AI
Rikard Rosenbacke, Carl Rosenbacke, Victor Rosenbacke et al.
Developing Competency in AI Ethics: A training framework
Alexandra Prégent, Alexei Grinbaum
Large Language Models, Machine-Assisted Cultural Analytics, and the Agentic Turn
Andres Karjus
What Counts as Evidence? Epistemic Cue Utilization in Large Language Models
Jinchang Zhang, Kaijun Jiang, Guoyu Lu
Knowing Is Not Telling: Identity Ossification in LLM Representations of Trans-border Communities
Minglu Sun, Lan Chen, Hang Jiang