Generalized Qualitative Probability: Savage revisited
Daniel Lehmann
Abstract
Preferences among acts are analyzed in the style of L. Savage, but as partially ordered. The rationality postulates considered are weaker than Savage's on three counts. The Sure Thing Principle is derived in this setting. The postulates are shown to lead to a characterization of generalized qualitative probability that includes and blends both traditional qualitative probability and the ranked structures used in logical approaches.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A 1/2-Approximation for Pandora's Problem with Deadlines
Shenyu Qin, Chihao Zhang, Yuhao Zhang et al.
Asymmetric Information in Dynamic Lending Games
Kristijan Atanasov, Frederik Mallmann-Trenn, Carmine Ventre
The Distortion of Threshold Approval Multiwinner Voting
Mohamad Latifian, Marzieh Nilipour, Alexandros A. Voudouris
Complexity of Autobidding Equilibria in GSP Sponsored Shopping
Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, Yuhao Li, Xinhao Nie
Limit-sure Winning in Team Games without Shared Randomness
Léonard Brice, Thomas A. Henzinger, Alipasha Montaseri et al.
Network Topology Shapes AI Intervention Effectiveness on Deception: Truth-Telling vs. Investigative Agents
Zhao Song, Stefan Sarkadi, The Anh Han