Developing Open Data Models for Linguistic Field Data
Baden Hughes
Abstract
The UQ Flint Archive houses the field notes and elicitation recordings made by Elwyn Flint in the 1950's and 1960's during extensive linguistic survey work across Queensland, Australia. The process of digitizing the contents of the UQ Flint Archive provides a number of interesting challenges in the context of EMELD. Firstly, all of the linguistic data is for languages which are either endangered or extinct, and as such forms a valuable ethnographic repository. Secondly, the physical format of the data is itself in danger of decline, and as such digitization is an important preservation task in the short to medium term. Thirdly, the adoption of open standards for the encoding and presentation of text and audio data for linguistic field data, whilst enabling preservation, represents a new field of research in itself where best practice has yet to be formalised. Fourthly, the provision of this linguistic data online as a new data source for future research introduces concerns of data portability and longevity. This paper will outline the origins of the data model, the content creation components, presentation forms based on the data model, data capture tools and media conversion components. It will also address some of the larger questions regarding the digitization and annotation of linguistic field work based on experience gained through work with the Flint Archive contents.
Create a lesson
Related papers
OC-AND: A Citation-Enriched Benchmark for Author Name Disambiguation
Francesca Cappelli, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
A precision-driven evaluation protocol for author name disambiguation
Francesca Cappelli, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
Life after delisting: tracking the publication output and citation impact of Scopus-discontinued journals with OpenAlex
Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo, Fernando Sánchez-Pita
The Challenges of PROTAC Permeability Prediction
Lukáš Hudec, Rocío Mercado
Citations Are Late: Reading epistemic instability from what papers believe, years before the citation graph catches up
Andrey Ustyuzhanin, Ekaterina Trofimova, Denis Zuenko
Large scientific teams are more, not less, disruptive
Junming Huang, Yu Xie