Citation advantage of Open Access articles likely explained by quality differential and media effects
Philip M. Davis
Abstract
In a study of articles published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Gunther Eysenbach discovered a significant citation advantage for those articles made freely-available upon publication (Eysenbach 2006). While the author attempted to control for confounding factors that may have explained the citation differential, the study was unable to control for characteristics of the article that may have led some authors to pay the additional page charges ($1,000) for immediate OA status. OA articles published in PNAS were more than twice as likely to be featured on the front cover of the journal (3.3% vs. 1.4%), nearly twice as likely to be picked up by the media (15% vs. 8%) and when cited reached, on average, nearly twice as many news outlets as subscription-based articles (4.2 vs. 2.6). The citation advantage of Open Access articles in PNAS may likely be explained by a quality differential and the amplification of media effects.
Create a lesson
Related papers
greCAPTCHA: Assessing Understanding as Evidence of Research Authorship Under Generative AI
Justin Payan, Bálint Gyevnár, Atoosa Kasirzadeh et al.
Shifting Research Funding Priorities under Geopolitical Pressure: Evidence from Estonia
Yunfeng Gao, Yang Ding
Geospatial Metadata Improves Discoverability by Connecting Datasets Across Scientific Disciplines
Daniel Ebanks, Devika Jain
Quantifying the impact of clinical-academic collaborations
Mohamad Zeina, Nick McNally, Karl S. Peggs et al.
Testing Our Foundations: Citation Trends, Errors, and Emerging Hallucinations in the Computing Education Literature
Paul Denny, Gweneth Barbre, Musa Blake et al.
Toward non-textual representation of social anthropology: Modeling cultures as knowledge graphs
Manolis Peponakis, Sarantos Kapidakis, Martin Doerr et al.