Unambiguous Computation: Boolean Hierarchies and Sparse Turing-Complete Sets
Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Joerg Rothe
Abstract
It is known that for any class C closed under union and intersection, the Boolean closure of C, the Boolean hierarchy over C, and the symmetric difference hierarchy over C all are equal. We prove that these equalities hold for any complexity class closed under intersection; in particular, they thus hold for unambiguous polynomial time (UP). In contrast to the NP case, we prove that the Hausdorff hierarchy and the nested difference hierarchy over UP both fail to capture the Boolean closure of UP in some relativized worlds. Karp and Lipton proved that if nondeterministic polynomial time has sparse Turing-complete sets, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses. We establish the first consequences from the assumption that unambiguous polynomial time has sparse Turing-complete sets: (a) UP is in Low2, where Low2 is the second level of the low hierarchy, and (b) each level of the unambiguous polynomial hierarchy is contained one level lower in the promise unambiguous polynomial hierarchy than is otherwise known to be the case.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Marton's conjecture in polynomial time
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Sabee Grewal et al.
Efficient Randomized Communication Without Large Monochromatic Rectangles
Haoyu Wang, Pei Wu
On the Turing Completeness of Transformers and Agents
Yimu Qiao, Lijia Yu, Ruichen Qiu et al.
Dense Pinwheel Packing Is Strongly NP-Complete
Yusuke Kobayashi, Bingkai Lin, Joseph Swernofsky
A Separation Between Distribution-Free SQ Learning and Dimension Complexity
Shyamal Patel
Almost Optimal FPT Inapproximability for k-SetCover
Venkatesan Guruswami, Xuandi Ren