Reply to "Comment on 'Background Thermal Contributions in Testing the Unruh effect' "
Sandro S. Costa, George E. A. Matsas
Abstract
Park et al's recent comment (hep-th/9605132) that for detectors with large energy gap in comparison with the temperature of the background thermal bath, the maximum excitation rate is obtained for some non-zero detector's velocity is correct but was previously discussed by ourselves elsewhere, and moreover does not affect in our paper above any mathematical formula, numerical result, and consequently our final conclusion that the background thermal bath does not contribute substantially in the depolarization of electrons at LEP.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A universal sector of N=1 class S spectra
Ritabrata Bhattacharya, Abhay Katyal, Oscar Varela
Reflected entropy and islands in JT gravity from partial dimensional reduction
Debarshi Basu, Himanshu Chourasiya
q-deformed Weil-Petersson Volumes from the Spectral Edge of DSSYK and Supersymmetric Extensions
Wasif Ahmed, Joydeep Naskar, Krishan Saraswat
Modular Properties of Generalised Gibbs Ensembles: The Deformed KdV Hierarchy
Faisal Karimi
The Quasiparticle Ansatz for Relativistic Continuous Matrix Product States
Silviu S. Pufu, Benjamin T. Søgaard, Spyros Terlemes
Anomaly induced transport in holographic superconductors
Ashis Tamang, Nishal Rai, Javier Esteban et al.