Connections between Linear Systems and Convolutional Codes
Joachim Rosenthal
Abstract
The article reviews different definitions for a convolutional code which can be found in the literature. The algebraic differences between the definitions are worked out in detail. It is shown that bi-infinite support systems are dual to finite-support systems under Pontryagin duality. In this duality the dual of a controllable system is observable and vice versa. Uncontrollability can occur only if there are bi-infinite support trajectories in the behavior, so finite and half-infinite-support systems must be controllable. Unobservability can occur only if there are finite support trajectories in the behavior, so bi-infinite and half-infinite-support systems must be observable. It is shown that the different definitions for convolutional codes are equivalent if one restricts attention to controllable and observable codes.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Stable Movement for Nondual Lipschitz Convex Optimization: Efficiency and Nearly Optimal Oracle Rates
David Martínez-Rubio, Cristóbal Guzmán
The First-Order Oracle Complexity of Lipschitz Convex Optimization in Nondual Settings
David Martínez-Rubio, Brian Bullins, Cristóbal Guzmán et al.
Complexity Of Output Feedback Stabilization
Amir Ali Ahmadi, Abraar Chaudhry, Ijay Narang et al.
Convergence rate of the moment-SOS hierarchy for univariate polynomial optimization
Didier Henrion, Mohab Safey El Din
Geometry and Convergence of Quadratically Regularized Optimal Transport I
Alberto González-Sanz, Marcel Nutz
Constraint Qualifications and Gradient Flows for Block Vanishing Constraint Problems
Julian Niederer, Christoph Hansknecht, Andreas Potschka et al.