The limit of a Stanley-Wilf sequence is not always rational, and layered patterns beat monotone patterns

Abstract

We show the first known example for a pattern q for which n ∞ [n]Sn(q) is not an integer. We find the exact value of the limit and show that it is irrational. Then we generalize our results to an infinite sequence of patterns. Finally, we provide further generalizations that start explaining why certain patterns are easier to avoid than others. Finally, we show that if q is a layered pattern of length k, then L(q)≥ (k-1)2 holds.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…