Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: residue method vs saddle-point approximation
Yulian V. Vanne, Alejandro Saenz
Abstract
In recent articles [Mishima et al., Phys. Rev. A, 66, 033401(2002); Chao, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 053414 (2005)] it was proposed to use the residue theorem for the exact calculation of the transition amplitude describing strong-field ionization of atomic systems within Keldysh theory. This should avoid the necessity to apply the method of steepest descent (saddle-point approximation). Comparing the results of both approaches for atomic hydrogen a difference by a factor of 2 was found for the 1s, and an even more drastic deviation for the 2s state. Thus it was concluded that the use of the saddle-point approximation is problematic. In this work the deviations are explained and it is shown that the previous conclusion is based on an unjustified neglect of an important contribution occurring in the application of the residue theorem. Furthermore, the applicability of the method of steepest descent for the ionization of Rydberg states is discussed and an improvement of the standard result is suggested that successfully removes the otherwise drastic failure for large principal quantum numbers.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Collective dressed states for inelastic light scattering by atomic ensembles
Sébastien Lucas, David Wilkowski, Christian Miniatura et al.
Cancellation of D2 line transitions of alkali-metal atoms by magnetic-field values
Artur Aleksanyan, Susanna Petrosyan, Emil Gazazyan
Controlling light shifts in chip-scale atomic beam clocks
Alexander Staron, Mingwu Lu, Ruwan Senaratne et al.
Estimating the ground-state hyperfine shifts of group-1 atoms due to long-range collisions, static electric fields, and nearby surfaces
B. H. McGuyer, K. Choksi, N. VonHeeder et al.
Photoelectron interferometry with spectrally shaped polychromatic infrared pulses
E. A. Boati, G. Arvidsson, M. Ammitzböll et al.
Coherently Enhanced Cherenkov Radiation by Highly Relativistic and Ultra-Compact Electron Beams
S. Kim, C. Müller, A. B. Voitkiv