Response to: "Isotropic deceleration and near-zero baseline acceleration in Pantheon+ supernovae: new arguments in the dark energy debate''
Animesh Sah, Mohamed Rameez, Subir Sarkar
Abstract
Ray et al. [1] have claimed that the acceleration of the Hubble expansion rate inferred from Type Ia supernovae in the Pantheon+ catalogue "is equally strong in the CMB dipole (qm = + 1.45) and anti-dipole hemispheres (+ 1.55), directly contradicting the SRS26 anisotropy argument". Here SRS26 refers to our analysis [2] which showed that "locally q0 has a strong dipole anisotropy aligned approximately with the bulk flow, and only a small monopole component remains at distances exceeding a few hundred Mpc". We find that these authors confused Equatorial with Galactic coordinates, thereby getting the CMB dipole direction wrong. Hence their conclusion is baseless.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Follow-up of SN 2025wny VI: The Rate and Detectable Population of Strongly Lensed SLSNe-I in ZTF
Jacob O. Hjortlund, Edvard Mörtsell, Ariel Goobar et al.
Cosmological anatomy of interacting dark energy
Miguel A. Sabogal, Sunny Vagnozzi, Eleonora Di Valentino
Void probability function in the Quijote simulations
Snehasish Bhattacharjee
Constraints of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and Cosmological Observations on varying Higgs VEV
Hongrui Feng, Yudong Luo, Toshitaka Kajino et al.
Infrared Universality of Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Beyond Second Order
Chen Yuan
Resolving 3 Exotic Hyperbolic-Umbilic Lensing Configurations in the "Cosmic Mantis": An Exploration of RXJ0437.1+0043 with JWST
Catherine Cerny, David J. Lagattuta, Keren Sharon et al.