The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Ampère that years later would be done to him
María Florentina Mendoza Urán
Abstract
In the history of physics, the name scaffolding has been given to whatever served to raise a theory and is afterwards removed because, it is said, it is no longer needed. This article documents, from the originals, what it cost Maxwell's theory when that method was applied to it: what was removed from it, who did it, with what argument, and how over the years it had to be recovered because it was understood that it was needed after all. It also records what Maxwell himself missed in Ampère, what he calls the traces of the scaffolding: the template with which Ampère himself had given shape to his work.
Create a lesson
Related papers
On the Utility of Textbooks in Understanding the Renaissance of General Relativity
Bernadette Lessel
The contribution of Soviet scientists to the emergence of high-energy neutrino astrophysics: from the Cherenkov effect to underwater and in-ice telescopes
Bakhromzod Rizoi
When quantum field theory kicks in: the relation between matter, gravity and energy
Antonio Ferreiro, Andrea Cavallaro
Astronomia Ova: Kepler's Laws, Ptolemy's Equant, and Legendre's Polynomials
Cristopher Moore, Malcolm Smith, Stephan Mertens
On Gauge Gravity's 'Hypermomentum Challenge' to the Geometric Trinity
Kartik Tiwari
What is Physics For? Why Classical Physics is not the Limit of Quantum Mechanics
Adam Frank, Jacques L. Pienaar, Michel Bitbol et al.