The Energetic Particle Detector Instrument on ELFIN
Colin Wilkins, Ryan Caron, Ethan Tsai, Chris Shaffer, Patrick Cruce, Maxwell Chung, Andrei Runov, Jiang Liu, Drew Turner, Yuri Shprits, Wen Li, Michael Lawson, Emmanuel Masongsong, Cindy Russell, Eric Grimes, Jiashu Wu, Matthew Allen, Jessica Artinger, Alex Flemming, Brayden Hesford, Laura Iglesias, James King, Austin Norris, Carter Pedersen, Daniel Thomlinson, Wynne Turner, Vassilis Angelopoulos
Abstract
We present the design methodology, implementation, and data products of the Energetic Particle Detector (EPD) instrument on-board the Electron Losses and Fields Investigation (ELFIN) dual SmallSat mission. ELFIN was designed to study the time-evolution of energetic particle distributions in Earth's magnetosphere, having operated in polar Low Earth Orbit (LEO) from 2018 to 2022. Each satellite's instrument payload contained a pair of detector heads to sense differential-directional fluxes of 50 keV to 5 MeV electrons (EPDE), and 50 keV to 2 MeV atomic ions (EPDI), with an energy resolution better than 50% (ΔE/E<0.5). The satellites were spinning with a nominal period of 2.8 s in a plane containing Earth's background magnetic field, with particle counting intervals subdivided into 16 consecutive spin sectors. Each EPD was paired with a three-axis Fluxgate Magnetometer (FGM) sampled at 80 Hz for local pitch-angle determination. Each detector head operated on the principle of pulse-height analysis (PHA) in solid state media, collimated by a rectangular 22.5 field of view and entrance aperture. The EPDE contained a stack of 6 silicon detectors (0.7 cm total thickness) with 0.15 cm2 str geometric factor, with ion contamination mitigated by an aperture foil and digital coincidence logic. The EPDI contained a stack of 2 silicon detectors (0.1 cm total thickness) with 0.03 cm2 str geometric factor, with electron contamination mitigated by a magnetic broom stage and digital anti-coincidence logic. The total assembled mass, volume, and power required for the EPD detector heads and circuit boards were 939 g, 10×9.8×8.4 cm3, and 2.3 W, respectively. We describe each EPD design element alongside instrument data products and processing.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Energy, vertex, and time response of a LiquidO detector with an opaque-scintillator target to Compton-tagged electrons
LiquidO Collaboration, S. Katz, J. T. Moffatt et al.
Cryogenic characterisation of the FBK NUV-HD-cryo Silicon Photomultipliers for the DarkSide-20k dark matter experiment
F. Acerbi, P. Adhikari, P. Agnes et al.
Performance and Radiation Damage of the Heavy-Ion Silicon Beam Tracker in the BM@N Experiment
D. Chemezov, S. Khabarov, Yu. Kopylov et al.
FINESSE: A Versatile Beamline for Fundamental Interactions with Neutrons at the European Spallation SourcE
J. Amaral, J. Barrow, M. Bartis et al.
Readout chain of SPD DAQ system
L. Afanasyev, A. Berngardt, A. Boikov et al.
A Low-Temperature Tool for Acousto-electric Detection
Rohit Mandlik, Sunil Nair