Comment on ``Influence Functional for Decoherence of Interacting Electrons in Disordered Conductors'' (cond-mat/0510563v1) and on related papers (cond-mat/0510556v1 and cond-mat/0510557v1)
Dmitri S. Golubev, Andrei D. Zaikin
Abstract
Recently von Delft (cond-mat/0510563v1)(JvD) has successfully re-derived our influence functional for interacting electrons and claimed that within our approach he was able to obtain the electron decoherence rate that vanishes at T=0. In this Comment we demonstrate that this JvD's claim is in error, as it is based on ambiguous and uncontrolled manipulations violating basic principles of quantum theory, such as energy-time uncertainty relation, causality, fluctuation-dissipation theorem, detailed balance and the like. We also briefly address insufficient approximations employed by Marquardt et al. (cond-mat/0510556v1) and by von Delft et al. (cond-mat/0510557v1) and demonstrate that the results of all three papers in the limit T=0 are inconsistent with simple rules of algebra.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Distinguishing Quantum Capacitance Signatures of a Topological Majorana Wire from a Normal Wire Segment
Binayyak Bhusan Roy, Jay Deep Sau, Sumanta Tewari
Band's Geometry Origin of Quantum Spin Transport Phenomena
Elena Derunova, Mazhar N. Ali
Trapping e/4 quasiparticles in bilayer graphene
Mario Di Luca, Emily Hajigeorgiou, Ning Ma et al.
Scalable, Simple, and Versatile Encapsulation of 2D Materials and Devices
Gabriel Natale, Uma Chirkova, Flávio Henriques Feres et al.
Mobility Enhancement in Si/SiGe Quantum Well Enabled by a Buried Si Layer Trapping Oxygen Impurities
Felix Reichmann, Alberto Mistroni, Fabian Fidorra et al.
Occupation-Driven Josephson Diode in a Symmetric Junction
Jianxiong Zhai, Zelei Zhang, Jiawei Yan