Comment on "Theoretical analysis of the transmission phase shift of a quantum dot in the presence of Kondo correlations"
A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, Y. Oreg, J. von Delft
Abstract
Recently, A. Jerez, P. Vitushinsky and M. Lavagna [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127203 (2005)] claimed that the transmission phase through a quantum fot, as measured via the Aharonov-Bohm interferometer, differs from the phase which determines the corresponding conductance. Here we show that this claim is wrong for the single level Anderson model, which is usually used to describe the quantum dot. So far, there exists no derivation of this claim from any explicit theoretical model.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Distinguishing Quantum Capacitance Signatures of a Topological Majorana Wire from a Normal Wire Segment
Binayyak Bhusan Roy, Jay Deep Sau, Sumanta Tewari
Band's Geometry Origin of Quantum Spin Transport Phenomena
Elena Derunova, Mazhar N. Ali
Trapping e/4 quasiparticles in bilayer graphene
Mario Di Luca, Emily Hajigeorgiou, Ning Ma et al.
Scalable, Simple, and Versatile Encapsulation of 2D Materials and Devices
Gabriel Natale, Uma Chirkova, Flávio Henriques Feres et al.
Mobility Enhancement in Si/SiGe Quantum Well Enabled by a Buried Si Layer Trapping Oxygen Impurities
Felix Reichmann, Alberto Mistroni, Fabian Fidorra et al.
Occupation-Driven Josephson Diode in a Symmetric Junction
Jianxiong Zhai, Zelei Zhang, Jiawei Yan