Is there Ballistic Conductance Quantization in Real Life Metals Nanocontacts?
N. Garcia, Ming Bai, Yonghua Lu, M. Munoz, A. P. Levanyuk
Abstract
Theory and a vast set of experimental work in metals, since a century, appear to show that the mean free path of conduction electrons in a real metal is about the min (bulk mean free path, smallest transversal size of the metal), a result that was already proposed by J. J. Thomson in 1901. This establishes, as discussed in this work, serious difficulties to justify conductance quantization and ballistic transport in atomic/nanocontacts or nanoconstrictions of real life metals. The ohmic resistance of the leads proves to be as important as the ballistic one of the constriction.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Distinguishing Quantum Capacitance Signatures of a Topological Majorana Wire from a Normal Wire Segment
Binayyak Bhusan Roy, Jay Deep Sau, Sumanta Tewari
Band's Geometry Origin of Quantum Spin Transport Phenomena
Elena Derunova, Mazhar N. Ali
Trapping e/4 quasiparticles in bilayer graphene
Mario Di Luca, Emily Hajigeorgiou, Ning Ma et al.
Scalable, Simple, and Versatile Encapsulation of 2D Materials and Devices
Gabriel Natale, Uma Chirkova, Flávio Henriques Feres et al.
Mobility Enhancement in Si/SiGe Quantum Well Enabled by a Buried Si Layer Trapping Oxygen Impurities
Felix Reichmann, Alberto Mistroni, Fabian Fidorra et al.
Occupation-Driven Josephson Diode in a Symmetric Junction
Jianxiong Zhai, Zelei Zhang, Jiawei Yan