On the hardness of distinguishing mixed-state quantum computations
Bill Rosgen, John Watrous
Abstract
This paper considers the following problem. Two mixed-state quantum circuits Q and R are given, and the goal is to determine which of two possibilities holds: (i) Q and R act nearly identically on all possible quantum state inputs, or (ii) there exists some input state that Q and R transform into almost perfectly distinguishable outputs. This problem may be viewed as an abstraction of the following problem: given two physical processes described by sequences of local interactions, are the processes effectively the same or are they different? We prove that this problem is a complete promise problem for the class QIP of problems having quantum interactive proof systems, and is therefore PSPACE-hard. This is in sharp contrast to the fact that the analogous problem for classical (probabilistic) circuits is in AM, and for unitary quantum circuits is in QMA.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Bipartite Carrier Compression and Machine-Certified Bounds in Schönhage Trilinear Multiplication Tensors
Volkan Dağlı, Zerrin Dağlı, Dağhan Dağlı
How far is Kolmogorov-Loveland randomness from Martin-Löf randomness?
Tomislav Petrović
The Complexity of Finding Additional Solutions
Saman Farhat
On the Hardness of 4-to-1 Games with Perfect Completeness
Yumou Fei, Dor Minzer, Shuo Wang
Near-Inverse-Linear Barriers for Explicit Affine Witness Isolation
Sebastian Ben Daniel
∃ R ⊂eq CH
Alex Meiburg