Effective Hamiltonians with Relativistic Corrections I: The Foldy--Wouthuysen transformation versus the direct Pauli reduction
H. W. Fearing, G. I. Poulis, S. Scherer
Abstract
Two different methods of obtaining ``effective 2× 2 Hamiltonians'' which include relativistic corrections to nonrelativistic calculations are discussed, the standard Foldy--Wouthuysen transformation and what we call the ``direct Pauli reduction''. We wish to investigate under which circumstances the two approaches yield the same result. Using a generic interaction with harmonic time dependence we show that differences in the corresponding effective S--matrices do arise beyond first--order perturbation theory. We attribute them to the fact that the use of the direct reduction effective Hamiltonian involves the additional approximation of neglecting contributions from the negative--energy intermediate states, an approximation which is unnecessary in the Foldy--Wouthuysen case as there the 4× 4 Hamiltonian does not connect positive-- and negative--energy states. We conclude that at least in the cases where the relativistic Hamiltonian is known, using the direct Pauli reduction effective Hamiltonian introduces spurious relativistic effects and therefore the Foldy--Wouthuysen reduction should be preferred.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Impact of ab initio E1 strength on neutron capture rates along the nickel isotopic chain
Francesca Bonaiti, Joanna E. Sobczyk
Final-state centrality in relativistic heavy-ion simulations from neural networks
Anibal Bezerra, Fernando G. Gardim
Constrained coupled-cluster computations yield negative-parity rotational bands
Gaute Hagen, Benjamin Bally, Thomas Papenbrock
Levy-shaped femtoscopic sources from an exact solution of relativistic hydrodynamics
Bence Szentkuti, Mate Csanad
Octupole correlations in the excited 0+ states and two-neutron transfers in actinide nuclei
Kosuke Nomura
Macroscopic study of ϕ-mesic nuclei in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV with the PACIAE model
Qiang Wang, Zhi-Lei She, An-Ke Lei et al.