Response to Worrying Trends in Econophysics
Joseph L. McCauley
Abstract
This article is a response to the recent Worrying Trends in Econophysics critique written by four respected theoretical economists. Two of the four have written books and papers that provide very useful critical analyses of the shortcomings of the standard textbook economic model, neo-classical economic theory and have even endorsed my book. Largely, their new paper reflects criticism that I have long made and that our group as a whole has more recently made. But I differ with the authors on some of their criticism, and partly with their proposed remedy.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Distinct routes to phase transitions in spatial activation systems
Jialu Zhang, Guanyu Zhang, Leyang Xue et al.
District-Level Food Environment Indicators and Social Vulnerability in São Paulo
Pedro Lemes Sixel Lobo, Eric Tokuda, Kuruvilla Joseph Abraham et al.
Prompt Sensitivity of Generative Agents: Evidence from an Epidemic Model
Ross Williams, Niyousha Hosseinichimeh
Giant strongly biconnected components of directed networks: a generating function approach
Minsoo Yang, Reinhard Laubenbacher, Byungjoon Min
(k,n)-core percolation on hypergraphs with anchor nodes
Hoseung Jang, Byungjoon Min, Ginestra Bianconi
The complex relationship between anti-immigrant sentiment and exposure in the Netherlands
Benedikt Meylahn, Tommaso Giommoni, Mike Lees et al.