A survey of energy loss calculations for heavy ions between 1 and 100 keV
A. Mangiarotti, M. I. Lopes, M. L. Benabderrahmane, V. Chepel, A. Lindote, J. Pinto da Cunha, P. Sona
Abstract
The original Lindhard-Scharff-Schiøtt (LSS) theory and the more recent Tilinin theory for calculating the nuclear and electronic stopping powers of slow heavy ions are compared with predictions from the SRIM code by Ziegler. While little discrepancies are present for the nuclear contribution to the energy loss, large differences are found in the electronic one. When full ion recoil cascade simulations are tested against the elastic neutron scattering data available in the literature, it can be concluded that the LSS theory is the more accurate.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Measurement of the free ion yield and estimate of the electron mobility of Trimethyl-Bismuth (TMBi)
B. Gerke, V. Hannen, S. Peters et al.
Beam Spill Structure Measurements at CEE Using the T0 Detector
Shuaike Lv, D. Hu, Dayu Yin et al.
CNN-based Position Reconstruction for the T0 Detector in the HIRFL-CSR External-target Experiment
Shuai-Ke Lv, D Hu, M Shao et al.
Application and Optimization of the GET Electronics System for Double-Sided Silicon Strip Detector Readout
Jiawei Bian, Zaihong Yang, Qite Li et al.
Cavity Characterization for the Princeton Axion Search
Nate Otto, Jianyang Fu, Joelle-Marie Begin et al.
First demonstration of 50\,ps four-dimensional vertex reconstruction with the Timepix4 beam telescope
David Bacher, Kazu Akiba, Martin van Beuzekom et al.