A survey of energy loss calculations for heavy ions between 1 and 100 keV
A. Mangiarotti, M. I. Lopes, M. L. Benabderrahmane, V. Chepel, A. Lindote, J. Pinto da Cunha, P. Sona
Abstract
The original Lindhard-Scharff-Schiøtt (LSS) theory and the more recent Tilinin theory for calculating the nuclear and electronic stopping powers of slow heavy ions are compared with predictions from the SRIM code by Ziegler. While little discrepancies are present for the nuclear contribution to the energy loss, large differences are found in the electronic one. When full ion recoil cascade simulations are tested against the elastic neutron scattering data available in the literature, it can be concluded that the LSS theory is the more accurate.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Design and performance of the Fast Beam Condition Monitor for luminosity and background measurement at the CMS Experiment in LHC Run 3
The CMS BRIL Collaboration, Eliana Acurio, Ying An et al.
AlGaN/GaN Hall-Effect Sensor for In-Situ Magnetic Field Monitoring of the HSX Stellarator
Yiming Zhao, Wayne Goodman, Thomas Gallenberger et al.
Measuring and Modelling Lag in Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel X-ray Detectors
Yiyue Huang, Benjamin Young, Andrew Kingston et al.
Signal formation and induction-gap optimization in a THGEM coupled to a resistive plate anode
Arpan Maity, Luca Moleri, Maryna Borysova et al.
Development and Commissioning of the Cryogenic Target Detectors for the Technical Run of the NUCLEUS Experiment
N. Schermer, H. Abele, G. Angloher et al.
Aliased noise characterization and mitigation in BICEP Array 150, 220 and 270 GHz time-division multiplexed detectors
S. Fatigoni, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed et al.